Author: T T Thomas
Publisher: Excel Books,
2004 (First)
ISBN: 8174464034
Pages: 212
September 30, 2001 dawned as an uneventful Saturday
for the employees of the Fertilisers and Chemicals Travancore Limited, one of
the leading state-owned fertilizer companies in India and located in Kochi, Kerala.
Being the end of the month, a few people were bound to retire from the services
of the company on that day. Little did they know that in a government office far
way in the national capital of New Delhi, an order was signed the previous
evening reducing the retirement age of the company from 60 to 58 overnight. At
the stroke of a pen, this nullified the services of 378 people who had already crossed
the age of 58. A confidential order was prepared in the company, listing out
the names of the 378 unfortunate personnel under the strict supervision of a General
Manager of the HR department, whose name was the first in the list. The people
knew of the decision only after they reported for duty in the morning. Some
were on leave that day and one person was on an official tour to central India.
Such excuses did not avail, all of them had had to leave the company that day
itself. The shock, consternation and dismay felt on that day were simply
indescribable, somewhat comparable to what 9/11 must have appeared to Americans
just 19 days before. Some of them were literally shattered by the decision, but
put up a brave face for their colleagues. In fact, their co-workers were
inconsolable at the end of the day. Setting aside the human factor for a while,
don't you think that a company which takes such momentous decisions on the fly
would be among the Fortune 500 list, or at least an incumbent among the Maharatna
companies in India? Unfortunately, nothing is farther from the truth. It still pulls
on, wiping away the last rupee of its net worth in a mounting burden of debt
and losses. This book is the story of the company as told by one of its Chairmen-cum-Managing
Director of the company. T T Thomas joined FACT Ltd in 1963 as an executive
trainee and climbed steadily up the corporate ladder till he adorned the
topmost position. He was also the president of the All India Management Association
(AIMA) and treats us with a very pertinent survey on the state of public sector
enterprises in India prevailing in the year 2003. The story of FACT is
generally representative of the state of public sector in India.
FACT was founded in 1943 in the princely state of Travancore
in South India in the immediate aftermath of the horrendous Bengal famine which
killed an estimated 2.5 million people. The enlightened king of Travancore, who
had granted temple entry rights to depressed castes seven years back,
immediately saw the need to increase food production in the state by scientific
means. The early years of the company witnessed some novel chemical processes
instituted for the first time on an industrial scale. Trees were cut from the
evergreen forests of Idukki, transported through Periyar River to Aluva and gassified
to make ammonia for the production of ammonium sulphate. Gradually the company
expanded its product range to include urea and complex phosphatic fertilizers.
Quite unusually in the fertilizer industry, a second production division was
granted to the company at Ambalamedu. In the 1980s, it diversified into
petrochemicals with the production of caprolactam, a raw material for the
manufacture of nylon filament yarn. A complex brew of internal and external
factors made the company slip into the red with the setting up of an ammonia
plant at a huge cost which was unnecessary and unwarranted by the
circumstances. The loan burden and the crippling interests brought the company
to its knees, which was somewhat alleviated by a loan write off and conversion
of debt to the government as equity. It has since stopped the production of urea
and caprolactam and struggles on under the wings of its legendary product Factamfos
20:20 which is an excellent nutrient in the farm sector and have a near
universal acceptance in South India. The enterprise’s early years were of
technological innovation and growth. It was financially strong and
technologically advanced. This book tells the story of its journey from riches
to rags.
Many of the managerial lapses described in the text
specifically concern the operations of FACT and are not much relevant to
general readers. Thomas condenses the illnesses afflicting the company on more
than one occasion. Non-accountability of poor performance, assigning no value
for time in decision-making, fear of crucifixion for bold decisions, observance
of the rituals of procedures and an aversion to profits as a desirable
objective are some of the things which he remembers from his career stretching
to more than three decades. Decision makers had no sense of ownership of the
company. There was also the pathology of satisfactory underperformance, a state
of contentment where in the incumbent management is happy with the state of the
company though it is underperforming on vital parameters like return on capital
employed, profits, profit margins and so on (p.85). To add to the trouble, there
was no stakeholder pressure on the company, the owner being the government. The
author points to the presence of officers’ unions which vitiates the
atmosphere. The trade unions were circumscribed by laws such as the Industrial Disputes
Act, while managerial unions did not have these limitations. They often
intimidated the senior management with tactics such as the threat of vigilance
enquiry. Political intervention under the aegis of forums such as the Save Fact
Action Committee eroded the clout of management. Unions and their political
connections could decide things in the long term and management got
marginalized. Thomas wants the workforce of FACT to open their eyes to truth. They
wanted to believe that deregulation of fertilizer industry, globalisation,
government’s ‘wrong’ policies or some extraneous factor did the company in.
This may be true, but equally responsible are the internal issues such as
excess manpower, low productivity, restrictive practices, total absence of cost
consciousness, a floating group of workers and officers’ union office bearers
and a generally laid back atmosphere. What still saves the company is an
established customer base, a historically developed distribution channel and a
strong brand.
Like any of the management experts
in the post-liberalization era, Thomas blames the license-permit raj brought in
by Indira Gandhi when she swerved the country’s economy dangerously to the
left. FACT has been a victim of this flawed policy during its expansion phase
at Ambalamedu. It wanted to establish an ammonia plant there. Proven
enterprises in the UK, US and Japan were ready to transfer technology but only
in lieu of payment through foreign currency. Indira’s regime was loath to part
with foreign exchange. In its search for second-rung manufacturers, the company
encountered Montecatini Edison of Italy, who agreed to provide financial
assistance. They, however, did not have experience in designing large single
stream ammonia plants. The plant was mechanically completed in 1971, but could
be commissioned only in 1973 due to a long series of technical issues. It was
also beset with problems from the very beginning of its operational career. The
supplier’s credit on procurement limited the company’s ability to source
critical machinery only from Italy. The plant could be run at full load for the
first time in 1990, after a lapse of seventeen years since commissioning. A
mirror image of the plant at Durgapur in West Bengal was closed down in 1994
while FACT’s plant was taken down in 2001 for good.
The book is graced with many
annexures containing charts and tables supporting the major arguments. Detailed
narrative of the author’s legal battle to get appointed as the marketing
director of the company is superfluous in the larger scheme of things. The book’s
sole focus is on the story of FACT, the evaluation of the public sector in
India is mainly an extrapolation of the logic applicable in FACT’s case and
presented as an afterthought. Some old photographs of the company’s early
operations would have added immense interest and impact to the narrative.
The book is strongly recommended to
students of management.
Rating: 3 Star
No comments:
Post a Comment