Author: Prosanta Chakrabarty
Publisher: Penguin Random House,
2022 (First)
ISBN: 9780670095100
Pages: 232
We
are said to be living in a post-truth era where truth is not deemed something
absolute. People accept anything as truth which they wish it to be. Social
media makes a celebrity’s truth the same for all his followers. However, these
are philosophical concepts open to interpretation at many levels and ways. I
don’t know how scientific concepts which are always true can be reconciled with
the concept of post-truth I mentioned above. Touching an electrically live
object causes a painful experience is a proposition that is true whether you
believe that there is such a thing as electricity or not. But facts in natural
sciences cannot be expressed in such outright terms even though a large number
of researchers have studied the phenomena and are convinced of its merit. Evolution
is one such fact of the development of life on this planet. Since it runs
counter to the fundamental postulate of Abrahamic religions on the creation of
life, there is widespread opposition to it. We have seen similar resistance in
the past when the Church opposed Galileo’s heliocentric theory and know what
has come out of it eventually. Till that time, evolution will continue to be
resisted by believers who propose comic alternatives such as Creation or
Intelligent Design. This book is intended to explain the topic of evolution ‘to
anyone with an open mind to learning’. It is also meant to be a tool to aid
those who themselves want to explain the topic to others. Prosanta Chakrabarty
is an evolutionary biologist at Louisiana State University where he is a
professor and curator. He was born in Canada and brought up in the USA.
Creationists
often ridicule evolution as ‘just’ a theory of the development of life. The
author accepts that but adds the clarification that a theory in science is an
overarching term that has stood the test of time. A theory is often
interchangeably used with ‘law’. But in everyday parlance, ‘theory’ is
something questionable that remains to be proven. It is this misconception
which serves as a perfect opportunity for religion to teach creation and
intelligent design in US schools as ‘alternatives’. Chakrabarty then explains
Darwin’s ideas on what happened on earth. There is a single origin of life here.
That was a huge leap forward in thinking. Natural selection is the causative
mechanism to explain the diversity of all life. This idea was far ahead of its
time when Darwin first introduced it. Most scientists then was of the opinion
that different human races originated in distinct ways and places in the long
past.
The
book glances upon the period when Darwin’s “Origin of Species’ first appeared.
Though Darwin had postulated that species groups mutate over time, he had no
idea of how it actually came about. Unknown to Darwin, the ideas of genetics
were just taking shape in the garden of Gregor Mendel and anything like DNA was
not even dreamed of. That is the beauty and power of Darwin’s theory. Later
discoveries corroborated its hypotheses and strengthened it on the face of
severe criticism on the spiritual front. The zeitgeist of the time was that
offspring were a mix of their parents, which is called blending inheritance. If
this was true, variation would be lost in each generation due to the
indiscriminate mixing. Mendel’s experiments proved this wrong and established
that genetic traits are carried to future generations in discrete form rather
than continuous. But Mendel did not know how variation was maintained in the
gene pool. Mistakes in copying billions of DNA pairs cause mutations and change
in traits. The author also explains how different groups in a species who are
separated by geographical barriers change into different species in a process
called speciation. Here, isolation and time is the key formula. The gene pool
of separated groups will diverge through non-adaptive forces (neutral
mutations, genetic drift) and adaptive forces (natural selection) due to the
different environments these populations find themselves in.
A
notable feature in religious revelations of the origin of life is that Man is
the perfect creation of God. The Semitic religions claim that Man was created
in God’s image. This book punches holes in this argument by highlighting
evolutionary accretions in the human body that denigrates God’s talent as a
craftsman, not to say of the blunders He has committed in ‘designing’ the human
body. Several examples are given, of which the kneecap is one which is a
troublesome set of tendons and ligaments where a ball-and-joint like the shoulder
would have been a better design. The blood pressure in human body is more than
other animals as we took to bipedalism later in the series and a higher
pressure is required to pump against the force of gravity. But, only one
coronary artery is there to supply blood to heart’s muscles to do the job.
Several animals have more. Fish hearts are more foolproof that don’t get easily
clogged with fat. As a land animal, we have the advantage of getting more
oxygen directly from air than from water, but gas exchange is more difficult
through lungs than with gills. Moreover, we use the same tubing for breathing
as well as feeding with the attendant risk of choking.
The
author has not been successful in achieving his objective of making evolution
easily understandable to lay readers. But he has made it a guidebook of Wokeism
by unnecessary tirades against supposed social injustices that are irrelevant
in a book on evolution. In an instance of extremely perverted sensitivity,
Chakrabarty advocates that humans don’t need genders. This is not due to any
scientific or survival imperative, but due to some individuals in the LGBTQ
community show deviant behaviour from their assigned genders. He then picks
bones at the scientific community which usually represents a white man on the
node to represent all humanity in the tree of life. He argues that
representation matters and seeing the same subgroup represented as the ideal
human is damaging. He doesn’t mention what it damages – probably wokeism,
extreme liberalism or leftism? What in fact is the harm done if a person
drawing the tree of life put the image of a person who looks familiar (or
similar) to him? If evolution was discovered by African scholars, a black man
would have appeared there and the world would have accepted that too. The
author brings in Donald Trump into this book by quoting one of his speeches
confusing viruses and their supposed vulnerability to antibiotics. Even
Narendra Modi is there at the receiving end of the author’s barbs because he
and his party are accused to be promoting ‘eugenic-themed pseudo-science’. He
then calls Henry Ford ‘Hitler’s Hero’. He even manages to include Hindutva and
Dalit-Brahmin hierarchy in this book. This is good political propaganda but a
poor scientific treatise. He is more kind to the creationists than the
political right.
The
book is a total disappointment as it is ill-focused on all important topics and
dwells too long on side-issues. Each chapter is practically independent of each
other and hence the entire ensemble lacks coherence. Here you see the
individual VIBGYOR colours but not the composite white light. Concepts are
explained by illustrations that are complex, intimidating, not self-evident and
probably created by a person who finds evolution confusing to himself. Each of
them includes a half-page caption to make it appear intelligible. The book
incorporates an irrelevant comic strip on Darwin’s life that is totally
redundant with nothing new or interesting. Some illustrations printed in monochrome
with detailed captions are repeated as colour plates with the exact same
captions. Altogether, this is a miserably failed attempt to explain the subject
in a meaningful way. Obviously, the author has wasted much time in this effort
and the readers are advised not to repeat the same folly.
The
book is not recommended.
Rating: 1 Star
No comments:
Post a Comment