Author: Elsa Panciroli
Publisher: Bloomsbury Sigma, 2023
(First)
ISBN: 9781472983985
Pages: 320
We
are really awed by our planet’s collision with an asteroid at the end of
Cretaceous period 65 million years ago when dinosaurs became extinct. The
demise of this predator group prepared the ground for mammals to explore and
conquer all possible niches on earth. As a result, mammals grew in size, became
more and more diurnal and won the competition for scarce resources. Eventually,
a bipedal ape which developed a large brain size took over the world and
assumed nature’s role in making several species go extinct. This has been the
accepted lore regarding the development of mammals – and by corollary, of
humans too. This book presents a different view, one in which it is
conclusively shown that mammals existed and to a certain extent were spread
over the face of the earth much earlier than thought. What it paints is the
picture of a see-saw. Mammals proliferated in the Permian but were seriously
put back by the mass extinction at the end of the era. Reptiles, which include
dinosaurs, took prominence in the Triassic period which followed it. Then came
the asteroid at the end of Cretaceous and mammals again held sway which still
continues. This interesting story is told by Elsa Panciroli, who is a Scottish
paleontologist who studies the evolution and ecology of extinct animals. She is
an experienced science communicator and has written for mass-media houses.
The
author discusses on the so called ‘success’ of a species in biological
parlance. In fact, this is not to be confused with the dominance of a species
on others. The term ‘success’ generally means only that it could propagate
itself over time in an uninterrupted lineage. In that sense, all species living
today are successful up to now. Moreover, while there are only 5,500 species of
mammals, there are 18,000 species of bird and 35,000 of fish. That’s just
vertebrates. There are over one and a half million species of beetles. So, who
is the most successful? This should be kept in mind while making tall claims
such as this was the ‘age of mammals’. The only thing is that mammals include
the largest vertebrates and we are disproportionately focused on size. However,
they originated much earlier than the current consensus. Paleontology suggests
that they arose 350 million years ago in the supercontinent of Pangaea. Around
300 million years ago, mammals parted ways with reptiles. Mammals did not
evolve from reptiles; they only shared a common ancestor. The belief that
mammals followed reptiles in dominance of the world became prevalent as most of
the early fossil evidence found in Europe came from secondary rocks and
belonged to reptiles. After a catastrophe, they were wiped out and mammals
appeared in the tertiary age. The first fossil of a mammal ever found was the
jaw of an opossum-like animal discovered in 1820 in secondary rocks. With more
evidence coming from all over the world, the scientific world has now conceded
that mammals existed and flourished much earlier than the age of reptiles.
The
author narrates personal experiences of prospecting for fossils in her native
Scotland, Russia and South Africa. Mongolian expeditions of the pioneer
paleontologist Zofia Kielan-Jaworowska are given in some detail as she had
obtained the largest collection of Cretaceous mammals. The fossils demonstrated
that the age spanning 250 million years before the collapse of dinosaurs which
was the first age of mammals was ignored by scholars for a long time. Early
mammals like pelycosaurs looked like reptiles. We continue to see descriptions
like mammal-like reptiles to describe them. From among the ranks of the
pelycosaurs, a new group emerged which developed the key traits we associate
with modern mammals including warmer blood and higher energy lifestyles. They
also established – for the first time – an ecosystem which we still recognize
today as based on large numbers of herbivores fed upon by a smaller cohort of
carnivores. These cyanodonts are the ancestors of mammals which looked more
like compact dogs with increasingly enlarged and complex jaw muscles. This
change is linked to chewing with more complex teeth. At the same time in the
Late Permian, 252 million years ago, reptiles and other tetrapods were also
proliferating. Some of them had also evolved into giants. They would get their
lebensraum when mammals were most hardly hit by the end-Permian extinction
event.
The
Permian extinction was a great cataclysm in the life of biota on our planet.
Around 250 million years ago, volcanic activity peaked in the region which is
now in Russia which threw up volcanic ash and greenhouse gases in huge quantities
as to alter the global climate for millions of years. Three quarters of life
were wiped out and the next age – the Triassic – began with a slate wiped
clean. Reptiles and dinosaurs gained prominence and grew to large body sizes.
But the mammals were not always at the receiving end however. We have found
evidence of carnivorous mammals of this era that ate baby dinosaurs for food. In
late-Triassic, little mammals the size of a mouse spread across the globe.
These little creatures are thought to be the ancestors of us all.
Warm-bloodedness helped early mammals to become nocturnal and escape the
unwelcome attention of larger predators. The coldness of night is no barrier to
an animal carrying its own heating system. Most of the mammals (except humans,
of course) have only mediocre ability to distinguish vivid colours and their
eyes are more attuned to see shapes in the dark. It is surmised that humans and
primates re-acquired the ability to see colours through a mutation in the
genes, but their ability is still a far cry from the glorious visual world of
birds. Because they adapted as nocturnal animals, the sense of smell and sound
greatly developed in mammals.
Whether
intended or not, this book not only fails to discredit Lamarck’s use and disuse
theory as the reason for causing genetic changes in organisms, but on at least
two occasions, it lends a gentle support to it. In a footnote on page 31, the
author claims that ‘the characteristics that were used would be passed on, and
those that weren’t would atrophy which isn’t all that far off the mark’. This
is indeed far off the mark. Lamarck’s theory stayed afloat in the pre-genetics
era when the mechanism of inheriting a parent’s characteristic by the offspring
was unknown. I’m sure the author is well aware of this and obliquely suggests
natural selection as the mechanism that helped propagate features advantageous
to survive in a particular habitat, but some readers may get confused here and
think that Lamarck’s idea must have something in it. Another argument on the
same line is the adaptation of herbivores to digest plant matter by
incorporating helper bacteria colonies in their guts. Panciroli argues that
microorganisms may have initially been ingested by early tetrapods when they
ate some decomposing plant matter. Eventually, some of the plant-processing
bacteria survived in the gut and a symbiotic relationship developed. This too
is a broad statement enough to perplex a reader on how this new feature persisted
in a new generation of the animal. This book introduces flowering of plants as
a novel mechanism of species propagation developed around 120 million years ago
that helped in mammal evolution. Earlier, pollination was limited through wind
and water. Another interesting feature is the remark on
ancient human bones. Analysis of the bones between the Neolithic and bronze
ages (which is just yesterday by paleontological timescales covered elsewhere
in the book) shows that the intense manual labour of early farming lifestyles
made the average woman develop upper body strength comparable to a renowned
modern athlete. Life was really hard back then..!
It
is asserted that we are seeing a radical transformation in the study of
paleontology and that is part of the reason for writing this book. Use of
statistical methods to analyse big data and the routine CT scanning of fossils
have opened up entirely new fields of research. In fact, Panciroli is very
forceful – even to the brink of obsession – in boasting about the use of modern
technology and mathematical tools used by her and her colleagues around the
globe. This may be an attempt to enhance the stature of paleontology in the
minds of young readers and to attract them to its study. It’d be a good
exercise for the readers to look up the mentioned animals on Google as the
included photographs and illustrations are totally unappealing. A real turnoff
is the author’s punctilious political correctness that often leaps off the
pages to sting you in the eye. She frequently flays white European bias towards
discrimination of local knowledge regarding finding fossils. She credits
nameless native inhabitants, than the person who described it to the world.
This is mere showiness. She accuses the big names in her specialty of research of
having harboured racist views on ethnicity and a misogynist perspective of history.
As a successful woman typically considers herself a feminist by right, the author
stresses on the contribution of earlier women in elevating paleontology to a widely
respectable avenue of study. She accuses male bias in history and science and goes
as far as claiming the same bias in museum specimens since we often see the peculiar
features of the male displayed in such institutions! At the same time, she points
out amusingly that the term ‘mammals’ applied to a wide group of animals, is not
gender-neutral.
The book
is recommended.
Rating:
3 Star
No comments:
Post a Comment