Title: A Study of History, Vol 3 – The Growths of Civilizations
Author: Arnold
Joseph Toynbee
Publisher: Oxford
University Press, 1985 (First published 1935)
ISBN:
978-0-19-215209-1
Pages: 551
Toynbee continues his study through this third volume in
the series by analyzing the source, nature and ways of growths of
civilizations. In the first two parts, he specified what a civilization is and
how one such society sprouts its first shoots as a response to challenges from
physical or human sphere of influences. This volume discusses about the
criteria of growth, because once something takes birth, it is the next step to
take. This does not take place automatically, and this volume is a catalog of
several false starts and stillbirths. A creative minority in the society puts
forward original ideas which might be ridiculed by the unthinking majority of
the population. The pioneers then withdraw to seclusion in which the
metamorphosis of development of the idea takes place. In the fullness of time,
such savants return to the society and conquer the minds of the majority with
their seed of originality. This takes deep root in the society and it moves
forward on the path of development. We see from the numerous examples cited in
the volume that this principle is faithfully followed by all civilizations in
the world. The author appends an index which covers the first three volumes
with this part.
Once a society crosses the
threshold of stimulus and response, growth of civilization is the logical next
step. However, this is not guaranteed to take place on its own. In some cases,
the adaptation may happen to be greatly in step with the physical challenge
that the society is placed in a predicament in which it becomes impossible to
modify its behaviour to changing circumstances and the civilization becomes
arrested at the level. Toynbee’s statement of the fact may be thus summarized
but the justification of the argument is long drawn out and thorough. The four
civilizations, the Eskimos, Nomads, Osmanlis and Sparta are cited as examples.
All these faced an immense challenge in the human or physical arenas in which
the Nomads were forced to migrate to desert oases according to the season of
the year. The people are slaves to the climate, just like the Eskimos are
guided by the vagaries of snowfall. The characteristics picked up by the
barbarians don’t leave them easily even after they have established a
flourishing civilization. Nomads make use of animal assistance in the form of
horses and dogs to watch over the cattle. The author establishes that the
Spartans and Osmanlis (Ottoman Turks) exhibit this trait of nomadism by
recruiting slaves from the subject population and keeping them as watchdogs
over the human cattle. A bright narrative follows in which the in and out of
Janissary system of Turks and the ‘Agoge’ of ancient Spartans are enunciated in
precise detail. Ottomans took slaves from their Christian subjects In Europe
and Caucasus, trained them in selected professions, converted them into Islam
and made them work in administration and military of the Porte. These
Janissaries carried the day forward and even rose to the position of Vizier,
and sons of female slaves borne of the king even ascended the throne. The
Osmanli’s made use of this system of human watchdogs to guard over human
cattle, because the streak of nomadism runs straight through their ancestry in
the European Steppe.
The criterion for the growth of a
civilization is to be found out next. Toynbee argues that mere geographic
expansion or a supreme command of the human environment is not an indicator of
growth. In fact, these are symptoms of the civilization’s disintegration. This
counter-intuitive proposition is brought home by a plethora of examples plucked
out of the pages of world history. Hellenic Civilization reached its widest
geographical frontiers under Alexander the Great, but that was during the
disintegration phase, with the emperor himself coming out to the stage as a
barbarian. Similarly, Roman civilization enjoyed its zenith after the
successful prosecution of the Punic wars, but the empire entered its path to
decline immediately thereafter. In the human sphere too, the situation is not
at all different. The expansion of a society in the human environment may be
thought of as borrowing of artistic, political, social or military techniques
of that society by other populations. This also does not constitute a criterion
of growth.
Then, how do we know whether a
society is in the growth phase of civilization? A new concept of ‘Withdrawal
and Return’ is postulated at this point. The first spark of creative genius is
born in a single person, or among a few people in a society. The rest of the
populace may mock at these gifted few. They then withdraw from the general
stream of popular life and sharpen their intellect and ideas. At a opportune
time this creative minority returns to the midst of the society which alienated
or drove them out a short while before. But this time, the creative challenge
would have evoked a brilliant response, made all the more attractive through
embellishments accumulated over those years when the creative minority was
steeped in an apparent hibernation. Suddenly, the idea catches on public
imagination and the majority takes to it by mimesis. This puts in motion the
wheels of civilizations to progress. The author argues with evidence of
examples that this is the process through which a society grows. Not only
individual people, but penalized minorities also may follow the path of
‘withdrawal and return’ to pull off the vehicle of growth on their way.
Toynbee’s examples are plenty and convincing but one may have doubts on the
veracity of at least a few of them, like Paul Von Hindenburg, the German
administrator, or Clarendon, the English historian whose biographies are quoted
as proof of his concept of ‘Withdrawal and Return’.
The volume ends with the way in
which industrialism and democracy triumphed in the western world that went on
to conquer the whole world on the cultural plane. These ideals were not
compatible with a locally self-sufficient agricultural society burdened with
feudalism that carried a despotic monarch on its back. Medieval Italy
demonstrated the alternative concept of city-states that relied on commerce and
industry. The challenge of transforming the feudal structure to make it
compatible with city-states was taken up in every kingdom, but the successful
response was obtained in England which then stood as a role model for other
societies to imitate these ideals of industrialism and democracy.
Eruption of nomads from the
steppes of Asia and Africa had upset the balance of sedentary populations on
the edges of grasslands. The factor that put these aggressive behaviour in
motion had not been fully understood, but the author proposes a fine idea to
explain this recurrent phenomena. Toynbee proposes two factors to account for
this – climatic as well as human. The aridity of the steppe changes over a
period. With the conclusions of Ellsworth Huntington, it may be seen that the
cycle of aridity and humidity oscillates with a period of 600 years, the first
half of it being dry and the second half moist. The nomads find their habitat
shrunk by advancing desert line and a as a consequence erupt to the peasant’s
lands. During the second half, more of the steppe become cultivatable and the
peasants take back the land, forcing many nomads to accept sedentary lifestyle
or to penetrate deeper into the steppe. A comprehensive list of such eruptions
that correspond to the spokes of the cycle is given and it is quite convincing.
As far as the human factor is concerned, this implies the pull exerted on
nomads by the vacuum created by breakdown of sedentary societies which is
clearly evident from the examples listed.
Reading Toynbee is a tough
experience that should be thought of as a once in a lifetime opportunity. The
diction and vocabulary is so superb and the structure so crafted as to convey
many interrelated ideas in a single sentence. This is the general tenure of the
series, but the section on ‘An Analysis of Growth’ that looks into
philosophical roots and sources of the growths of societies is really tough.
You need superhuman perseverance to navigate through this thick mess of
esoteric concepts taken from works of J C Smuts and Henri Bergson. At another point, the author’s assertion that
western civilization has conquered all parts of the globe and positively or
negatively influences even opposition to it raised by other civilizations, is
noteworthy. Mahatma Gandhi’s agitations against the Raj is referred here, but
Toynbee states that even though he fights to put Indian ideals into reality,
his modus operandi of meetings, resolutions, petitions and opposition is so
thoroughly western and so is the path of Indian industry as against Gandhi’s
own ideals . The textile mills of Ahmedabad uses western production methods and
present as big to a contrast to Gandhi’s ideal of homespun cloth as the textile
factories of Manchester. This comparison presented on old dichotomy in a clear
light.
The book is highly recommended.
Rating: 4 Star
No comments:
Post a Comment