Title:
Napoleon
Author:
Alan Forrest
Publisher:
Quercus, 2012 (First published 2011)
ISBN:
9781780872506
Pages:
403
Every ruler covets power with glory,
but very few go on to achieve it. The priorities of the ruler and the ruled are
not in resonance in the normal course, which leads to resentment on the part of
the populace towards extraction of taxes and tribute and exasperation on the
king’s side at the stubbornness of the people to acquiesce in to his plans of
aggrandizement. In the course of centuries, some rulers would be able to place
their hands on the right nerves to excite and amass subjects under his standard
and such leaders of men enter the national myth. Napoleon Bonaparte was one
such emperor who shepherded the French armies to his battle tunes across the
length and breadth of Europe for nearly two decades. He directed the French
spirit to flow into the channels he had cut across established political
traditions, eroding them in the long term. This book is an excellent biography
of the French emperor from his birth to the internment of his ashes in Paris.
Alan Forrest is Professor of Modern History and Director of the Centre for
Eighteenth Century Studies at the University of York. He works on modern French
history, especially the period of the French revolution and empire, and on the
history of modern warfare.
A
man with vaulting ambitions of his own must necessarily be a bit opportunistic.
Nothing illuminates this better than Napoleon’s career. The author identifies
this trait from very early on. The emperor was born in Corsica, an island off
the French mainland in the Mediterranean Sea. The Italian Genoese ruled the
island for a long time, but power was usurped by Corsican insurgents. Just a
year before Napoleon was born France invaded and annexed it, forcing the
Corsican rebels to go into exile. An underground resistance movement was afoot.
A patriot would be expected to join the rebels, but Napoleon wisely opted to
enroll in a French military school and join the artillery. Forrest neatly
narrates the starting point of the future hero’s career by ditching his native
island. On the other hand, his decision was good for himself and Corsica in the
long run. Had he been part of the island’s army, the utmost he could have hoped
for was the deliverance from captivity and be its ruler, out of sight and mind
of the other European powers. As events turned out in the end, by sticking on
to France and becoming a part of its destiny, Bonaparte’s star shone with meridian
splendour for another three decades more.
Political
upheavals hardly interrupt the lives and careers of the common masses. But
collateral advantages can be reaped by a good number of them when revolutions
take place around them. The book clearly summarizes the full scale debt of
Napoleon for his rise to the French Revolution (1789); to its ideals of liberty
and equality and the meritocracy that lay at its roots and the huge
institutional changes it had wrought. The dyke of privileges and inheritances erected
by the Old Regime to help the aristocracy were rudely torn down and a sea of
ambitious commoners came rushing in. The nobility had had its monopoly repealed
in the officer corps of the army and the royal administration. Revolution
brought down barriers on the career path of Napoleon.
Forrest
gives only a cursory glance of Napoleon’s early military adventures in Italy
and Egypt, both of which couldn’t be termed as victories, even though the
future emperor used all tricks and strategies in his arsenal to influence
public opinion in his favour. We see the first stirrings of a media-savvy
administrator in Napoleon’s dispatches from Egypt and Italy. The author
includes a hearty description of the French legions’ maneuvers in the desert
country, where the soldiers were accompanied by a sizeable contingent of
archeologists, historians and scientists. The world owes these savants a great
deal for unearthing the Rosetta stone, which handed down the key to deciphering
hieroglyphs engraved on the tombs and other ancient remains like vases and
boxes. France’s persistent weakness was its navy, when compared to the
formidable British naval forces. Overseas ventures of Napoleon came to naught,
as Haiti declared independence and inflicted a crushing defeat on the French
navy sent to liberate the island.
The author has succinctly catalogued
the ever so slight movements made by Napoleon to assume the royal mantle on his
shoulders. The French Revolution’s lasting characteristic was its horrible and
bloody extinction of the monarchy of the Bourbons. Napoleon wanted to reinstate
monarchy by crowning himself as the emperor and enforce hereditary continuity
to the throne. The clever measures followed are interesting to read. The crown
lay at the end of numerous incremental steps, each of which provided space and
time for the elite and public to get accustomed to it. Each step generated
unease for the republicans, but they had to go along with the system which
ended in Napoleon becoming the hereditary emperor of France.
Glowing tributes are paid by the
author to catalog the victories of Napoleon in battle until he reached the
zenith of glory in 1807. Unfortunately for the emperor, he didn’t have the
supreme gift of the knowledge of when to stop. His armistices and peace
treaties were just devices to gain time for preparation for the next assault.
While technically at peace, he continued to form stratagems to take on Britain
and Russia, his remaining rivals in Europe. He planned a commercial blockade of
Britain, to bring to the knees its commercial empire which thrived on trade
with the continent. This idea miserably failed as traders resorted to
smuggling, while the brazen act stoking retaliation from the British Navy which
ruled the seas. The emperor’s rash and opportunistic decision making, coupled
with incessant warfare stretched the resources of the empire. It is estimated
that a total of four million men were killed on all sides in the Napoleonic
wars in Europe. This was too much for the smallest continent in the world.
Military alliances against Napoleon became grander and more numerous. France
inadvertently played into the hands of its enemies in the disastrous expedition
to Moscow, to teach the tsar a lesson in submission. Napoleon’s army was
decimated in the Russian winter, and the emperor abdicated and relegated to a
small Mediterranean island named Elba. He made a swift return to emperorship at
the head of an army of only 650 men, which waxed thick as it neared Paris.
However, the allies were determined and defeated him in the Battle of Waterloo
in 1815 and transported him for life to St. Helena, a small island in the South
Atlantic. Reduced to virtual confinement he breathed his last, six years later,
at the age of 52.
Napoleon cast a great burden on the
people he ruled, both in terms of money and manpower. People resented his rule,
especially after the reverses in wars became regular and ignominious. Forrest
explains why – even in spite of all the adverse feelings – the emperor remained
the favourite of the public. He brought in reforms in education, church and
justice, which were long overdue in view of the Enlightenment. Birth was not a
constraint on one’s ambition – in both ways, as talented aristocrats reentered
service. Professionalism and good judgment were the key attributes for
administrative appointment. He implemented a civil code which became the
hallmark of French rule. Wherever the French went, the Code followed.
The last days of the emperor is
touchingly narrated in the book, as also the flourishing of his myth in France
and Europe after his death. Judging from history, Napoleon may be termed the
last transnational hero produced by France. There is a school of thought among
historians that Napoleon was slowly poisoned in St. Helena. This had its
origins when scientists detected traces of arsenic in his hair kept as souvenir
by his attendants during the last days. Forrest discounts this hypothesis with
the argument that the level of arsenic in his hair may have accumulated by
other natural means and presents stomach cancer as a plausible reason for his
comparatively early death. However, the refutation is not very convincing as it
is not accompanied by substantive proof. The book is written in an elegant and
absorbing style. We can only see the barest glances of the French Revolution
and the Napoleonic Wars. Readers who have no knowledge of this before might
find it difficult to follow the argument. Forrest is not at all keen in mentioning
dates of events – even Waterloo is undated. The narration is totally centred on
the person of Napoleon. History of France finds mention only when it is
absolutely essential to elaborate some aspect of Napoleon’s decisions or
career. The book is made more interesting with a good number of pictures. A
large collection of detailed notes is included as well as a good index.
The book is highly recommended.
Rating: 4 Star