Friday, August 24, 2012

Richter's Scale




Title: Richter’s Scale – Measure of an Earthquake, Measure of a Man
Author: Susan Elizabeth Hough
Publisher:  Princeton University Press, 2007 (First)
ISBN: 978-0-691-12807-8
Pages: 312

Charles Francis Richter possesses the enviable distinction of being one of the best known scientists in any branch of science. Whenever an earthquake occurs anywhere in the world, the media faithfully reproduce the magnitude of the quake in the scale eponymous to him. Even lay people won’t rest contentedly until they knew the magnitude of the temblor. Though very few understands the intricacies of the scale, and even fewer know that the scale is not a physical device, there is one fact which is understood by all – the more you go up the scale, the consequent catastrophic damage would also go up exponentially. The author who is herself is a seismologist at the US Geological Survey, California has served as an editor and contributor to many scientific publications and is the author of many books. Since she worked in the same institution as Richter, the technical as well as personal correctness of the narrative may never be doubted.

Though being the lone well known seismologist in the world – a household name, to be precise – Richter rose from humble surroundings. Born in 1900 as the second child of parents who divorced twice among themselves, he had an unhappy childhood and the familial problems forced him to receive psychiatric help at the age of 20. However, he recovered from the problems and continued studies, finally obtaining a PhD in Physics from Caltech, with specialisation in quantum mechanics. Right at the same time, a seismological lab was being set up there in 1927, which needed a research assistant with a physics background. Richter joined the institute as the rest, as they say, is history. The U.S. witnessed a lot of earthquakes in the 19th century, but it soon became apparent that California, the Golden State, was sitting on a geologically active area. Devastating earthquakes in 1868 and 1906 opened the eyes of administrators who were reluctant to put a halt to the pouring in of investment to the state. The 1906 quake magnified the fissure on the surface called San Andreas Fault, where the North American plate rubs against Pacific plate. But in Richter’s time, plate tectonics had not been developed.

Attempts to measure the intensity of quakes began a long time ago. The Rossi-Forel scale developed around 1880 was one such scheme. It was Richter who proposed a scale for measuring the magnitude of earthquakes through a 1935 paper. Though named after him by the media, the development of the scale was the combined product of Richter and several of his worthy colleagues, like Beno Gutenberg who was regarded as the most accomplished seismologist of the time. The scale is logarithmic, which was said to be as suggested by Gutenberg. However, Richter didn’t tell otherwise when the media made the development his brainchild. The scale has no upper limit, but we are yet to witness a world shattering magnitude 10 quake. The greatest quakes the world had witnessed since 1900 was Chile 1960 (mag 9.5), Alaska 1964 (9.2) and Indian ocean 2004 (9.1). Each quake produces energy which is 30 times more than a quake with 1 less than it on the Richter scale. Also, the number of quakes increase by a factor of 10 for lower magnitudes. So, number of magnitude 4 quakes will be ten times more than magnitude 5 quakes. New measurement parameters unavailable to Richter have helped seismologists to revise the scale to moment-magnitude scale which reflects the quake’s power more faithfully.

The book details more on Richter, the man and his emotions and escapades than on the work for which the world remember him even today. Hough’s lengthy chapters on the personal relationships of the scientist makes for uneasy reading, especially so when she quotes from his personal papers donated to the archives posthumously. Richter says, “My picture of human relationships has never been restricted to those involving only two people; I have seen too many exceptions”. Honest sentiments, but hardly admirable! However, the author ends the chapter with a snippet of timeless wisdom, “It is fair to say that complicated people as a rule have complicated relationships and Richter was about as complicated as they come”. One who took the book for the quake content will be disappointed at the protracted personal narrative.

In the end, when one closes the book for the last time, the feeling he gets is this: Richter obtained fame disproportionate to what he deserved. He freely acquired inputs from several peers, but was careless to acknowledge the debt. However, the author takes great pains to drive home the point that Richter was a good educator, who cosied up to the media when the occasion arose and spoke in a language no ordinary scientist could manage. Were it not for the magnitude scale, his fame among seismological circles would still have been secure, as the author of the great 1958 textbook, ‘Elementary Seismology’ which find usage even today, which in itself is a remarkable achievement in the scientific field where great strides have been made in the intervening period. Also, Richter was such an analyst that he understood answers for the questions that were not even formulated by his contemporaries. After retiring from Caltech in 1970, he continued work as a consultant for several years, until his death in 1985 from natural causes.

The book’s greatest advantage is that it was written by a seismologist who shared the same institution as Richter. She shares Richter’s conviction that scientific facts should be conveyed to the general public in parlance easily digestible to them. However, the author has diluted it very much that the murky result do not do justice to the expectations of readers, who are intrigued by the myteries mother earth hold in her bosom. The book includes a good number of photographs, at least some of them the author could have did without. Moreover, it clearly addresses the myth that animals can sense impending quakes. Hough says, “The idea that animals can sense impending earthquakes remains a persistent myth among the public. After any large earthquake, some people are always convinced that their dog, cat, or rose-crested cockatoo knew the temblor was coming. The problem is that on any given day, a certain percentage of cats act bizarrely for no apparent reason, because that’s what cats do. When an earthquake strikes, anecdotal accounts of prescient animals invariably arise. Animals can also sense an initial P-wave that escapes the attention of human observers, and therefore sometimes react a few seconds before the stronger S-wave arrives” (p.258). The work also includes many poems penned by the great scientist as he was very fond of writing poems which are soul-baring in nature.

The work is marred by numerous printing errors and carelessness in editing. Some of the errors are shocking, as it comes from a prominent university press! Such oversights mars the integrity of the book. Richter’s name itself is erroneously printed as ‘Ritcher’ in the captions of some photographs may be ignored, but the date of Indian ocean tsunami printed on page 130 is Dec 26, 2005, is a grave error. The year is in fact, 2004. Another drawback of the work has to be traced back to the author herself. As mentioned earlier, she has delved too deep into Richter the man instead of Richter the scientist, thus diminishing its stature as a work of science.

It would be worthwhile to conclude this review with a memorable poem written by Richter as he just turned seventy.

In Conclusion (1970)

No, I am not ungrateful.
Some living was quite good, and some was not.
Why quarrel with the general human lot?
Not too much has been hateful.

Fear there has been, dark fear
Amid the whirl-wind winds of fear and hate;
Small wonder that I never grew up straight.
Enough; I have survived, I’m here.

Some envy me, but those
Can never know how meager is my part
Of what they take for granted in the heart-
Far less than they suppose

Quietly I descend
These last long stairs, not hesitating much,
Nor fearing that expected gentle touch
That is to bring the end.

The book is recommended.

Rating: 3 Star

No comments:

Post a Comment