Title:
Indira – The Life of Indira Nehru Gandhi
Author:
Katherine Frank
Publisher:
HarperCollins, 2001 (First)
ISBN:
9780002556460
Pages:
567
Indira
Gandhi’s tenure as prime minister of India is remarkable for many firsts. It
was the first time that a woman could achieve the country’s topmost political
spot. It was then that the country had won a major war in more than a millennium
of history. It was also the first time that a democratically elected politician
imposed an autocratic regime on the people in the form of Emergency, which the
people endured with surprisingly little demur. Katherine Frank was born and
educated in the US, is the author of three acclaimed biographies and has taught
at universities in West Africa and the Middle East as well as Britain. During
six years of researching and writing this book, she spent extended periods in
India. Frank presents a comprehensive, but slightly adulatory account of Indira
Gandhi, first as the daughter of Jawaharlal Nehru and then as the undisputed
leader of India for a decade.
Nehru’s
family had the stature of a dynasty. Frank notes that the ancestors themselves
were very particular in associating with the powers that be. Raj Kaul who
migrated from Kashmir to Delhi was a member of the court of Mughal king
Farrukhsiyar in 1716. His great grandson Lakshmi Narayan was a lawyer of the
English East India Company. Another forefather Gangadhar was a police officer
in Delhi when the mutiny broke out in 1857. However, the family’s takeoff to
the stratosphere of power took place with Jawaharlal Nehru, based on the wealth
generated by Motilal Nehru’s legal practice at Allahabad. The family’s knack of
managing finance was lost with Jawaharlal while that of managing politics was
missing two generations later in the time of Rajiv Gandhi. Nehru maintained
good personal rapport with the British even while opposing them on principles.
The Cripps Mission of 1942 which examined constitutional reforms of India was
opposed by Congress, but its leader Sir Stafford Cripps was a friend of Nehru. The
book mentions a nice anecdote when Cripps visited Nehru’s private residence at
Anand Bhawan. He stayed for a few days there and was a strict vegetarian. Not
many in Anand Bhawan were vegetarian and very little fruits and vegetables were
available in the Allahabad market. Nehru ordered melons from Kabul and grapes
from Quetta for the visitor!
Nehru
is thought to be a great statesman who moulded India with his ideological
principles. Ever since Congress was expelled from power for the first time in
1977, more and more memoirs had started coming out, detailing the political
acumen of him. Needless to say, most of the tales are disappointing for
patriotic Indians. Some shocking observations can be seen in the book, One Life is not Enough by K Natwar
Singh, reviewed earlier in this blog. This book presents a few episodes where
the great leader’s true colours can be discerned. And no, I don’t mean to point
out anything personal. We may grant him some reprieve on that front on account
of the dictum that no man is perfect. But his fumbling on the Kashmir policy
has caused great loss of lives and material for the country. Nehru’s Kashmir
policy was solely founded on the person of Sheikh Abdulla. When he started
showing overbearing and partisan tendencies, Nehru was at a loss to what to do.
In the end, he was arrested and put behind bars for nearly a decade that tarnished
the country’s credibility in the eyes of the world. In another instance, Frank
narrates Nehru’s impulsive reaction to an international incident. When he heard
that Chou En Lai’s plane had crashed at Hong Kong, he immediately wanted to
send a telegram to the British prime minister, suspecting the incident to be
orchestrated by British Intelligence. This message was very rashly worded and
it required all the persuasive powers of Indira to detain him from dispatching
the message. How much equanimity can we expect from such a person who handled
the foreign affairs portfolio till his death? When the pro-American Sri Lankan Prime
Minister Sir John L Kotalawala moved a resolution in the 1955 Non-Aligned
Summit at Bandung condemning the neo-imperialism of the Communist Bloc, Nehru
was so incensed that he wanted to walk out. So much for non-alignment!
Readers
are more interested in reading about the events after Indira came to power, but
a very large portion of the book is devoted to cover life before her ascent as
the prime minister. But it then scrutinizes her unsure progress to the peak of
glory in 1971, when Bangladesh was carved out after vivisecting Pakistan. Her
early years as prime minister were beset with political and economic problems.
To score a point over her rivals in the party, she adopted a socialist façade –
without any sincere ideological commitment. She nationalized commercial banks,
insurance companies, installed a license-quota-permit raj to rein in private
enterprise and forfeited the Privy Purse granted to former sovereigns at the
time of accession of their states to India. This endeared her to the masses,
but caused catastrophic damage to the economy. The author reiterates the
ideological bankruptcy of Indira by comparing the earlier and latter parts of
her term from 1966 to 1977. After her son Sanjay’s rise to prominence – who was
a proponent of free market competition and autocratic ways in dealing with the
public – she backtracked on leftist populism. After reaching the summit of
popularity in 1971, the author wryly comments that she had nowhere to go but
down.
And
down she went! Indira’s rule marked India’s unfortunate decline to corruption
and muscle power of the rich. Sanjay openly made or marred deals. The book
presents some details of corruption at Sanjay’s Maruti factory, which was set
up to manufacture small cars. P N Haksar, the principal private secretary of
Indira, was a man of integrity but was jettisoned from the post when he opposed
some of Sanjay’s intrigues. Not content with that, Sanjay’s cronies in the
government raided the business enterprises run by two elderly relatives of
Haksar and arrested them. People who argue that Indira was ignorant of the
mischief created by Sanjay will be hard-pressed to find a response as to what
happened to Haksar. Indira’s politics was more a show than dedication was clear
in her response to a question on literacy in India posed by an American
journalist in 1978. Her outburst was ‘I
don’t know how important literacy is. What has it done for the West? Are people
happier or more alive to problems? On the contrary, I think they have become
more superficial” (p.433). It has been the bane of India to have
politicians like Indira Gandhi who wanted the people to be kept in darkness and
feared that they’d be swept out of power when the populace became enlightened.
Indira
Gandhi opened an era of terror in the form of Emergency (1975-77) when
individual rights were suspended, opposition leaders put in jail and all
political activity stopped. She was thrown out of power, but was rehabilitated
three years later when the people who ousted her fought bitterly among
themselves. If Indira is still remembered with a touch of fondness, the reason
for that is her martyrdom, supposedly while trying to safeguard the integrity
of the nation. But Katherine Frank describes many events which reveal that
Indira dug her own grave. She encouraged and provided support to Jarnail Singh
Bhindranwale, a dreaded Sikh militant, in order to engineer a split in Akali
Dal, a party that stood up to and threatened the political supremacy of
Congress in Punjab. She provoked unrest in other parts of the country by
dismissing the state governments at her will, for protecting the petty
political interests of her own party. The basis of all these undemocratic and
underhanded deals was her desire to cling on to power at any cost.
The
book is written with a good amount of research on Indira. However, the author’s
grasp of the political landscape of India and other political parties than
Congress appears to be amateurish and derived unchanged from other works. A
noted feature of the book is its propensity to be a fountainhead of gossip. The
suggestion on the parentage of Feroze Gandhi is shocking, as also that on his
personal life and rumours in Allahabad. Allusions to M O Mathai’s (Nehru’s
private secretary) relations with Indira are simply outrageous. It is suggested
that a chapter titled ‘She’ was removed from Mathai’s biography at the behest
of Indira because it contained nasty personal references to her. The book
contains a few monochrome plates, a commendable section of Notes and a good
Index. A chronology would’ve helped it much better.
The
book is highly recommended.
Rating:
3 Star
No comments:
Post a Comment