Title: The Age of Kali – Indian
Travels and Encounters
Author: William Dalrymple
Publisher: Flamingo, 1999 (First published 1998)
ISBN: 978-0-00-654775-4
Pages: 371
This book, published in 1998 was
Dalrymple’s fourth and third in his series on Indian themes. He is a renowned
author, requiring no formal introduction to the subcontinental readers. He is
staying in Delhi and has become a distinguished presence in Indian literary
circles. This is his sixth book to be reviewed in this blog. The earlier ones
are, The Last Mughal, White Mughals, Nine Lives, City of Djinns and
From the Holy Mountain. With his easy prose verging on the graceful
contours of finely crafted verse, each book is a cherishable experience for the
reader. Now there are only two Dalrymple books which have not been presented
here, In Xanadu and his latest, Return of a King, which are
eagerly awaited.
The Age of Kali (not to be
pronounced Kaali) is the story of the writer’s travels across the Indian
subcontinent. The title implies Kali yug, which is the fourth and last era of
Indian time reckoning, in which virtue and the good beats a retreat, paving the
way for evil and vice. The traditional society blames every misfortune that has
fallen on them to be because of Kali yug and resigns calmly to fate. In the
book which is partitioned into six parts, namely The North, In Rajasthan, The
New India, The South, On the Indian Ocean and Pakistan, the author travels
extensively and records his experiences at each place. Comparisons are inevitable
in such a setting and he notes the rising prosperity of the South and the West
as compared to Bihar and Uttar Pradesh, which are slowly sinking into a morass
of violence bordering on lawlessness and corruption. He also brings into focus
the enormity in scale of the annexation of Hyderabad and Goa to India which are
euphemistically called ‘police actions’ in official history books. Recording
the experiences of eye-witnesses, we get to know that they were full fledged
military operations involving the army and air force, and also the navy in Goa.
While being a pleasure to read, on
many occasions the author falls in the trap of eulogizing over the lost
grandeur of aristocrats fallen from grace as the country gained independence
from colonial or local imperialist powers. Traces of this trait was discernible
in the author’s earlier book, City of Djinns which based Delhi as its
theme in which he blindly followed the riches-to-rags nobility of the old
Mughal system. During his travels in Lucknow, narrated in the chapter Kingdom
of Avadh, we see a little known feudalist Suleiman gloating over the things
he lost in the feudalist period like poetic symposia, architecture (which
naturally changed with the times) and even prostitutes who could recite Persian
verses. Not a small portion of his grief is over the fact that those dear
artifacts of his past no longer exist anywhere. This feeling of nostalgia over
the loss of the past is seen to transcend religious barriers. When he visited
the Rajmata Vijayaraje Scindia in Gwalior, her own attendants who were Hindus commiserated over the lost kingdom of the Maharajah with its extravagantly
gilded processions, tiger hunts and the absence of corruption. We have only
their word to attest to the last named item! But even they couldn’t deny the
wastefulness of lavishly constructed Jai Vilas Palace nearby in a vain bid to
impress the Prince of Wales who paid a visit to the place in the latter half of
19th century. The palace was constructed at a huge expenditure on
the impoverished exchequer.
What is quite unexpected and
revealing is Dalrymple’s visit to Deorala, Rajasthan where in 1987 a young
widow named Roop Kanwar chose to die by burning herself on her husband’s
funeral pyre. With about 500 villagers as spectators, the flames consumed her,
who was sitting on the pyre with her dead husband’s head on her lap. Makeshift
temples were quickly erected for her as she had turned into a goddess, Sati
mata, with her valorous deed. Protests soon broke out at many places.
Journalists and women activists exposed the incident and claimed that she was
forced to die by her relatives who were accused of having drugged her. Police
arrested 66 of the villagers and used third-degree measures to elicit a
confession from them. The case went on for 10 years until the trial court
acquitted all of them for want of evidence with severe criticism reserved for
the police for the way they investigated the case. Dalrymple visited the
village, interviewed them and later corroborated the story with senior civil
servants at the state capital. The facts which come out is indeed shocking.
Roop had really chosen to die of her own free will, with no apparent coercion.
The modern part of India, the anglicized urban elite couldn’t stomach the idea
that connubial fidelity would drive a young woman to court death. Such secular
incredulity marks the remove the elite is from the rural heartland.
Dalrymple has correctly identified
the source of much rural strife in India as due to caste enmity. In Rajasthan,
he describes how hordes of upper caste Rajputs descended on makeshift medical
facilities intended to serve the lower castes and smashed them to smithereens,
apparently to protest against the Central government’s decision to implement
the Mandal Commission’s recommendations which suggested reservation of 27% of
government jobs to backward communities. Rajasthan, however displays the
diametrically opposite side of the situation in UP and Bihar, where the
backward castes have gained much political power, but even there, the private
armies of landlords ride roughshod over them. The author’s assertion that the
decision to grant reservation has resulted in an awareness of caste at all
levels is, however superfluous. Caste awareness for an Indian is like the
proverbial sixth sense. This is something which comes by birth and had existed
here for millennia.
Needless to say, the writer knows
the rhythm of India and is well versed with the vitality that animates the
national psyche in its forward thrust through the well-trodden path of
spirituality. The mental subservience to spiritual objects like tombs and
godmen flourish in the subcontinent. However, he seems to have a soft spot
towards the Islamic side of the Indian cultural stream. Whenever he speaks
about the other current, the Hindu stream, it is the backwardness and
unsophistication that is unconsciously stressed. Dalrymple may be called the
historian of the Indian Muslim aristocracy.
Though the author recognises the
touchiness of many Indians towards criticism from abroad, it feels that the
criticism is really harsher than warranted by the situation. He describes the
clash between two student political unions in Lucknow and declares it to have
been fought with assault rifles, which is stretching the imagination a lot. Has
he confused Lucknow with Peshawar, which also he has visited? Anyway, he claims
that the book is a work of love and “its subject is an area of the world I
revere like no other, and in which I have chosen to spend most of my time since
I was free to make that choice. I was completely overwhelmed: India thrilled,
surprised, daunted and excited me” (p.xv). I think we can accept his
arguments at face value.
A major source of disinterest seen
in the work is the chapter on Reunion Island, which is distracting in a book
centred on Indian themes and people. Stories on Pakistan and Sri Lanka
illustrate the cultural continuity of the subcontinent across political and
religious divides. No such affinity exists with Reunion which is a small French
island colony in the Indian Ocean and it sticks out like a sore thumb. Also,
clubbing Goa along with chapters on Sri Lanka and Reunion smacks of a feeling
that it is not culturally homogeneous with the rest of India.
The book is highly recommended.
Rating: 4 Star
No comments:
Post a Comment