Title: The Real Thing – Truth
and Power at the Coca-Cola Company
Author: Constance L Hays
Publisher: Random House, 2005 (First)
ISBN: 978-0-8129-7364-8
Pages: 358
Nothing is more familiar to the
world’s younger generation than the fizzy, brown liquid touted as the
ubiquitous symbol of energy and vitality – Coca-Cola. Founded in 1886, the
company has served many generations of people and has become a legend in
business administration. Constance L Hays describes the growth of the company
over the years, with special reference to the period after 1980 when changes of
a heretofore unseen nature happened and it witnessed its biggest growth
dynamics. The book narrates in detail how Roberto Goizueta transformed the
company when its sales had plateaued, how Donald Keough and Douglas Ivester
steered it through uncharted waters and provided astronomical value for the
shareholders. The work ends on a sober note after the grave setbacks faced by
the company after 1999 and the silverlining has still not appeared when the
book closes at the end of 2004.
Asa Candler purchased the secret
formula of Coke from its inventor John Pemberton in 1888. At first, the syrup
was mixed with soda water at the point of sale and drank by customers on the
spot. Benjamin Franklin Thomas and Joseph Brown Whitehead hit upon the idea of
bottling the carbonated syrup so that the product could reach the doorsteps of
a larger clientele. At first the company was restricted in its operation to the
sale of concentrate to independent bottlers who had the sole responsibility to
package and market it. Subcontracting to numerous associates, the bottling
industry’s growth was exponential. In 1919, the bottle’s dimensions and look
were standardized. The clout of the bottlers was felt too heavy by Coke
management soon after. Stuck with a system in which the parent company couldn’t
rise the price of syrup, confrontations and legal battles were imperative.
However, by the 1980s, more and more bottlers wound up their facilities which
were bought or taken over by Coke and its associate, the Coca-Cola Enterprises
which was formed to handle bottling business. Though it was technically another
company, entrusted with bottling and sales, Coke exerted critical influence in
its day-to-day operations as the major stake holder.
The recipe of Coca-Cola is a
jealously guarded secret even now. Only a few people even inside the company
know the ingredients, a list of which is kept in a bank locker. Analysts have
however identified the components from its chemical signatures. When it began
in 1886, Pemberton used trace amounts of Coca leaves (from which cocaine is
extracted), the flavour of cola nut from Africa, lime juice, vanilla and
several other substances in the make up. Cocaine was not regarded as a harmful
narcotic at that time, with physicians freely prescribing it for aches and
relief. Coke was quick to withdraw the coca content when it was legally
untenable to go along with the existing practice. The formula was again changed
drastically in 1985 to address the rising market share of Pepsi, Coke’s biggest
rival. The initiative was a very bold one to face Pepsi’s challenge which
offered a better taste. However, the move backfired when it was rejected
outright by the customers. New Coke, as it was known as a replacement of the
old one flopped in the market and the company was forced to bring back the old
recipe after just 78 days.
Coke always strived to be one step
ahead of its rivals, often resorting to dubious marketing strategies. It sought
to obtain monopoly rights to get its products displayed in supermarkets and
convenience stores. Coke’s tactics of strangling the competitors often went
afoul of anti-trust legislations and judgments were issued against the company.
In 1996, in a major coup, it stole Pepsi’s bottler in Venezuela to solely do
the bottling for them. The latter half of 1990s was however destined to witness
the sagging growth of Coke. First the company was sued against by some of its
own black employees alleging racial discrimination. It became apparent that the
number of blacks in senior management positions was abysmally low when they
constituted 15% of the overall workforce. Compounded with it was the recall of
product from Belgium, France and some other European countries when it was
detected that the carbon dioxide gas used in the bottles was contaminated. It
eroded a huge chunk of credibility from the company. In 2000, Coke was forced
to fire about 20% of the labour in a vain attempt to cut costs. When the
narrative ends in 2004, we get the impression that not all is well at Coke.
The book is a disappointing one. It recounts the history
of Coca-Cola mainly from 1980 onwards. Lacking an effective organising
structure, the narrative which lacks any interesting feature shuttles back and
forth between decades and centuries landing the readers in sheer confusion.
Except for occasional flashes of witty comments, the description is drab. The
layout is very bad, printed in very small letters and an unappealing font.
Altogether, the book is a very unremarkable one.
The book is not recommended for
the general reader.
Rating: 2 Star
No comments:
Post a Comment