Title: About Time
Author: Adam Frank
Publisher: OneWorld, 2012 (First)
ISBN: 978-1-85168-909-5
Pages: 337
First of all I need to say that
this book is a bit tough. Books in the popular science genre should not be so
difficult to grasp, otherwise people may find it easier to go after Nature
or Science, the reputed scientific journals. Frank talks about time and
its meaning to the society and to cosmology, the study of the universe. The
weight of learned opinion now tilts to the notion that time itself began with
the big bang in which the universe originated. This preempts any attempt to ask
questions like what went before the bang. What the author asserts is that
cosmic time and society’s concept of time are glued together and modified
according to improving standards of material engagement. For example, an individual
who lived in pre-historic times may find it meaningless and confusing to learn
that an event is scheduled to begin at 10.23 am. The methods of time reckoning
familiar to his society was based on the movement of the sun and a resolution
of a few hours was enough to run the society in good order, but not now. Modern
society engages vastly superior elements in time reckoning that a resolution of
even seconds may appear to be too long, in some circumstances. The book gives a
history of the progress in the idea of time over the ages and also a good
description of the theories governing the origin and development of the
universe.
All human societies, irrespective
of the state of cultural progress they were in, had means of time reckoning
that was amply suitable for their purposes. Though it may seem crude to us
today, the contemporaries of such primitive methods didn’t feel constrained by
any inadequacy of the device. Hunter-gatherers had a measure of time that
encompassed the day and the seasons. When neolithic farming and agrarian
societies entered the picture, accurate reading of the season in which farming
activities like seeding and manuring were performed became very important.
Curious it may seem, but these people had an idea of how the universe began and
allusions to such immense events are still represented by the myths that had
been passed on to modern times. By the time of classical Greece, rationalism
made its first halting step into learned discourse. Hellenistic thinkers
repudiated the need to invoke divinity into everyday life. Development of
calendars to reckon time had its beginning in Mesopotamia where accurate
measurements of celestial trajectories of planets was woven into the practice
of religion itself. The first systematic attempt to bring out a unified
calendar took place in 46 BCE when Julius Caesar modified the existing
mechanism to make Julian calendar which forms the basis of the calendar we
still use.
Society’s needs for accurate time
keeping depends on its material engagement. Frank lucidly explains the
development of clocks around 1300s that divided the day into equal parts. The
original inventor of mechanical clocks is unknown, but its spread like wildfire
ever since its first appearance in 1307 at Orvieto, Italy. Clock work was perfected
in a few centuries. Harrison’s naval chronometer set standards in fixing the
longitude coordinates at sea. As clocks proliferated, the need to set standards
of time between cities became a burning issue. It was pure chaos before 1883
when the railway mediated effort succeeded in proclaiming time zones whereby
cities falling within a 15 degree stretch of longitude had a common time.
Imagine the trouble when each city had a unique time while the railway had
another!
The 20th century saw
the marriage of space and time into a single entity and physics finally began
to move away from common sense. Einstein’s theory of general relativity
established conclusively that space and time does not stand out independently
as Newton had thought and that they are merged in an integrated artefact,
called spacetime. Likened often to a stretched rubber sheet, the surface of
spacetime gets curved due to the presence of matter or energy which causes
gravitation. Thus, instead of recognizing gravity as a force, Einstein showed
it as only a quirk emerging out of the curvature of spacetime. Development of
electronics and computers made the dependence of society more abstract through
the ubiquitous silicon devices. Even though the modern communication devices
free us from the fetters of space, we are more and more tied up to electronic
time set by the schedulers and calendars of the devices.
The book presents a comprehensive
discussion on the theories that purported to describe the universe and its
origins. From steady state theory in which it was believed that the universe
existed at all times, the Big Bang theory gained prominence as it could
successfully explain some of the observed facts like cosmic microwave
background radiation which other theories couldn’t. Coupled with the
developments in particle physics, cosmology entered a new phase in the 1990s.
The observation that the universe is expanding more rapidly threw an unexpected
road block on big bang theory’s path. Eternal inflation came up as a way of
accounting for this effect, but it threw up several problems in its wake on the
quantum level. Concept of multiple universes or multiverse which postulates the
simultaneous existence of several universes in which ours is only one. Though
it may appear far fetched, it helps to explain away the problem of the
existence of about 20 constants in the standard model of particle physics which
seem to be finetuned for the existence of life. If multiple universes exist, we
can always claim that we happen to be in one which is optimized for us!
However, these are only hypotheses and have no basis on observation. It is
doubtful that such concepts could ever be verified by experiment or
observation. We must note here that one of the basic requirements of a
scientific theory is that it should be falsifiable by tests.
Frank is a professor of astrophysics and his arguments on
history and culture are borrowed from other authors. Readers are forced to note
the very small number of authors he has relied on. Such references are thematic
and excessive reliance on other sources make the reading a bit tedious and
purposeless. Readability of the book waxes and wanes over the chapters. I’m
sure the somewhat dull stuff with which he begins the book must have caused a
sizeable loss of readers. However, the diction improves by simplifying as one
moves on and even becomes enjoyable at some points in the middle.
The discussion on cosmological
models is very comprehensive, but not original – not in the sense that it is
plagiarized. The theories could be gleaned from any popular science book which
is far more readable than this one. Throughout the book, the author maintain
that cosmic time and cultural time are somehow braided together, but not amount
of nitpicking has been effective enough to establish it conclusively. Arguments
are numerous, but not convincing enough!
The book is recommended only for
serious readers.
Rating: 2 Star
No comments:
Post a Comment