Title:
Ancient Worlds – An Epic History of East and West
Author:
Michael Scott
Publisher:
Hutchinson London, 2016 (First)
ISBN:
9781786330567
Pages:
411
Modern
man can travel a distance roughly 400 times more than that travelled by a
person in the ancient world. This nullification of distance in terms of modes
of travel and the ease of communication were brought about by great progress in
science and technology witnessed in the last 300 years. The world is now
tightly interconnected. Cataclysmic weather events that are supposedly
plausible in one part of the globe by the mere flutter of a butterfly in
another part of the world is of course a gross exaggeration, but it can’t be
denied that man-made events in one region can affect the outcome in another. Used
as we are to the instant nature of real-time communication, it might be hard for
us to think about an era in which there were no long-distance telephony, mobile
phones or the Internet. Yet, even in these primitive circumstances, human spirit
and endeavour crossed deserts, scaled mountains and forded rivers to establish trade
and cultural contacts with his fellow beings in other societies. The ouster of a
rebel, or the invasion by a nomad tribe, or the civil war in a kingdom often gave
rise to a chain reaction by migration, war or missionary work so as to alter the
course of history in another kingdom. There are many books available which deals
with the connected nature of the modern world, but very few that focuses on inter-civilization
interactions in the ancient. This book is an excellent one on that thesis, covering
the history of the world from early-sixth century BCE to late-fourth century CE.
It examines three new developments that came about – birth of democracy, consolidation
of empires and development of universal religions. Michael Scott is a quite young
professor of classics and ancient history at the University of Warwick and has authored
many books on the classical period. He is best known to the public as the presenter
of ancient history programs on the BBC.
The
first part of the book focuses on man’s relationship to man, as negotiated
through politics. Development of democracy in Athens was such a groundbreaking
event that the Athenian principles continue to be employed as a mark of
enlightened rule in the modern world. Cleisthenes set the basic principles in
508 BCE against tyrannical monarchs in Athens. What he christened the new
system was eunomia (good order)
against dysnomia (bad order) of the
old ways. Though it was also called isonomia
(equal order), the name demokratia stuck after the Persian invasions in
480s BCE. Scott takes great care to differentiate between the Greek system and
Rome’s republic established in 509 BCE by the expulsion of King Turquinius
Superbus. The new system of voting came to be known as res publica romana (the public thing of the Roman people). It was
an absolute democracy in Athens where the people were organized as individuals
and arbitrary tribes. Romans gravitated towards other interest groups such as
patricians, plebeians, aristocrats in an unelected Senate and military leaders.
The Roman republic provided for emergency powers to be concentrated in one
person designated as a dictator. When
the city’s survival was in jeopardy, this single head was deemed to be
essential to pursue particular ends, after which he would step down. This
difference made the Roman system beset with sectarian interests, but made
possible an elaborate circle of mutual checks and balances that kept all levels
of society believe that they had more to gain from the system than from
wreaking it. It is an eye-opener to the modern world that the more autocratic
Roman system had a greater lifespan than the total democracy of Athens.
Scott
then moves on to examine the relationships forged between ancient communities
through warfare. This was also the age in which mega states emerged across the
known world in the form of Rome and the Han Empire in China. The book presents
an absorbing story of the fight between Rome and Carthage for supremacy in the
Mediterranean. The actions and consultations between Hannibal and the Roman
general Scipio Africanus is absorbing. Interesting episodes from Polybius and
Livy are given here. However, the author’s coverage of India and China looks
more like an attempt to ensure a token representation to these two in a work of
this nature than a genuine effort to identify the common thread that links
these two cultures with their Roman, Greek and Seleucid counterparts. The
accuracy of facts related to India is especially doubtful. Ashoka is said to be
so transformed by his conversion to Buddhism that he is said to have donated
away all his wealth which spelt doom for his empire. Recent research on that
great Indian king portrays him as a much more pragmatic monarch than the naïve
king Scott makes him out to be. Ashoka didn’t shun violence altogether, as can
be expected from a king of those times. He didn’t turn vegetarian overnight,
but merely reduced the number of birds and beasts killed for food in the royal
kitchen. The narrative on Han dynasty is likewise sketchy and is just an
outline. However the author neatly summarizes the geo-political upset at the
western borders of the Han which propelled the Xiongnu tribe further west. This
made a domino effect. The Xiongnu uprooted the Yueshi who in turn drove the
Sakas before them. This exodus helped open trade routes between the East and
West that later came to be called the Silk Road. The first event ever to be
recorded in the histories of both East and the West is the invasion and
occupation of Bactria around 140 CE by the nomadic Yueshi tribe. Strabo and
Justin recorded this incident in Roman chronicles and Sima Qian in China wrote
about this upon hearing about it from the Han ambassador Zhang Qian deputed to
Bactria.
Development
of major religions as a response to the political climate in fourth century CE
constitutes the third issue the book analyses. This was a crucial period for
the religions – Christianity, Buddhism and Hinduism – in their theological development,
growth, acceptance and integration within human societies. Development of
faiths, while somewhat destabilizing for society, offered an opportunity to
harness that religious belief towards the security and expansion of imperial
power. Constantine is the most notable sovereign of this era. Whereas the
Romans persecuted Christians generally, Constantine’s strife-torn rise to power
and his need for controlling a vast empire constituting much diversity in
geography and society, compelled him to assume a gentler approach to it. Pagan
worship supported the idea of multiple rulers like multiple gods, while
Christianity provided strong support for Constantine’s vision of a single
unified community under a single ruler, like its single god. Even though he is
often counted as the thirteenth apostle, Constantine adopted a very pragmatic
policy towards different faiths. The agreement he signed with Licinius, the
ruler of the eastern empire, in 313 CE permitted toleration of all religions.
He continued worship of the Sun-god and banned all business on Sundays so that
the day could be dedicated to Sun-worship. It may also be recalled that he
accepted baptism only in his deathbed. Meanwhile Hinduism re-emerged from its
Vedic past in the Gupta period and Buddhism thrived in China in the interregnum
after the fall of Han dynasty. Thus ends the third part that studies the
relationship of man and gods as played out through adoption, adaption and
innovation in religious belief.
The
book is very informative as it stresses on the theme of connectedness of the
ancient world through the lens of three crucial moments and three themes. Karl
Jespers coined the term Axial Age
which runs from the eighth to third centuries BCE in which a profound change in
thought came amount in all the major regions of high culture in the world.
Though there was no communication between them, civilizations in the Axial Age
developed ideas and institutions that continue to be widely prevalent. Scott
develops on this idea and extrapolates his argument till the fourth century CE.
The chance-like nature of human civilizations seen through the narrative is
unmistakable. The author warns that the inevitable survival of any aspect of
our society should not be taken for granted, but instead we must fight actively
for what we wish to remain part of our world. Greece, Rome, India and China are
the major centres of culture visited in the book, but Armenia also find a
conspicuous place by elaboration of the growth of Christianity there. While
India is included, its peculiar innovation of republics of North India in the
pre-Mauryan period doesn’t find mention. The book is the most readable when it
describes events in Rome.
The
book is highly recommended.
Rating: 3 Star
No comments:
Post a Comment